SURVENT

**Please see my DISCLAIMER about Randall Raar information related to correspondence with Virginia Lee**

In one of the first e-mails between his ex-sister-in-law and me about Randall Raar, she stated the following:

I personally think that Randy is innocent of the charges against him. He rales against
the system in a loud manner and has associated with the wrong people and everything points to his
guilt. I know that. Yes, he is obsessed with sex, but again, he has a very young Thai wife that satisfied
those cravings.

He is a mad person and is consumed with his wish to expose the system. WHY was he
targeted for arrest? Who made a charge? What was he supposed to have done to warrant the arrest? He
wrote to the MDOC and was a huge nuisance to them and decided to shut him up. That is
all I can figure. He is out of money. His wife barely talks English, and she is lost and
afraid.

Virginia has said all along that she thinks he is innocent of the child porn charges but not necessarily so about the 1989 sexual assault of a 5-year-old girl which he was recently convicted of. Is it possible that he was set up for complaining too much, sure. Is that likely, not in my opinion. He was released from prison in 1984 after being convicted of sexually assaulting a child, he has a young Thai wife and Virginia even says he is obsessed with sex. Seems to me to equal a person who might strike again and commit another crime. I do not know for sure, but I would guess that once you have been convicted of a felony that even a whisper of a possible illegal act will bring the law down on you like the law came down on Raar. Virginia asks what he did to get targeted for the arrest - his sexual assault of a child years ago was probably enough. Are there some issues with the MDOC? Maybe, but when criminals gripe it seems that is it usually just so they can be heard and the validity of their accusations has to be questioned.